Dallas community leaders are rising against an initiative to abandon the current Dallas City Hall building. There's a public meeting on the topic taking place on November 3 at 6 pm at City Hall, 1500 Marilla St.

City of Dallas leaders are considering a proposal to abandon Dallas City Hall, the building designed by renowned architect I.M. Pei and completed in 1978. Most famously, it appears in the film Robocop.

The building's sharply angled design has drawn both admirers and haters alike. Some who've worked in the building applaud its open design, while others say it is not up to modern standards. Regardless of its functionality, its fans view it as a masterpiece of modern architecture — significant enough that it was recently recognized by the Dallas Landmark Commission, who voted to initiate historic designation.

Mayor Eric Johnson and other Dallas leaders say the building is in disrepair and that it will cost millions to fix. Exactly how much is not known, but a range has been cited as between $150 million to $356 million, versus an estimated $1 billion to build a new city hall. An engineering study of the building's needs is slated for next year.

They're trying to make it happen fast. A Special Meeting of the Economic Development Committee & Committee on Finance was called for November 3 to discuss "the state of City Hall," to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property located at 1500 Marilla St. They made the meeting "closed session," out of the public eye, claiming that "deliberation in an opening meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the governmental body in negotiations with a third person."

In a post called "Why It’s Vital City Hall Remains Standing," Candy's Dirt interviewed a passel of Dallas architects who defended its preservation. In addition, community leaders such as Betty Culbreath have come out against the action.

"City Manager Tolbert should make a clear statement of condition of the Dallas City Hall building supported by certified estimate of needed repair in total," Culbreath says. "The Manager should at that point make a recommendation to the Dallas City Council of best use for building — repair or rebuild — at that point Council should make decision.The Fox in the henhouse is the Sports teams wanting a new arena. We all know the Mavericks new owners want a place that will accommodate an eventual Casino if and when Texas lawmakers approve gambling, so for the City to put all its eggs in the basket with the Vegas group is foolish when they already purchased the land in Irving and has it approved."

Petition
A petition to "Save Dallas City Hall: Protect Our Iconic Landmark" has been launched, stating that "demolishing this architectural icon would be an irreversible loss for our city, erasing a landmark recognized worldwide for its form, engineering, and vision."

The petition calls on the Dallas City Council to:

• Halt any rush to demolish this irreplaceable civic landmark and actively engage the public in discussions about its future.
• Commission a comprehensive, transparent study by qualified professionals to objectively evaluate renovation, modernization, and repair options. Rigorously compare costs and community benefits versus relocation before making any irrevocable decisions. Keep community stakeholders fully informed at all points in the process

In a post, Dallas' former director of the Park and Recreation Department Willis Winters references the theory that city leaders are paving the way for the owners of the Dallas Mavericks to build a new stadium on the site, replacing American Airlines Center in Victory Park.

"Where is the impetus for demolition coming from—decades of budget neglect, or the sudden dramatic need for a site for a new arena for a basketball team owned by a Las Vegas gambling family?" Winters asks. "There is plenty of space for an arena within the footprint of the master plan for the new KBH Convention Center, yet the development buzzards are circling Dallas City Hall as if it is road kill."

Winters also notes the complication with the plaza in front of City Hall, which is a city park and thus requires special treatment.

"This building cannot be replaced at an equivalent cost of less than $900 million," Winters says. "The overinflated staff guesstimate of $345 million for renovation is a bargain compared to the price of purchasing a new site and constructing a new building of equal stature to that of our current City Hall. There is also the complicating issue of City Hall Plaza, which is designated as park land, and which CANNOT be sold to the buzzards without a public referendum."

"Dallas aspires to be a 'world class city,' yet the destruction of this magnificent building will bring world-wide disclaim," Winters says. "I implore our city leaders to do the right thing—don’t cave in to development pressures and certainly not to a basketball team that no longer has relevance, but to instruct the City Manager to undertake a detailed study by a competent consultants to analyze the condition of Dallas City Hall and to produce a comprehensive estimate of the true cost of renovations to bring it into the 21st century. Only with this information in hand can the City Council make the right decision."