Sports Q&A

Volleying questions to tennis star Frances Tiafoe during the 2023 Dallas Open

Frances Tiafoe is playing in the 2023 Dallas Open.

Photo by Lintao Zhang/Getty Images

The Dallas Open, the only indoor tournament on the men’s pro tennis tour in America, runs February 5-12 at the Styslinger/Altec Tennis Complex on the SMU campus. The event features 60 international players headed by top seeds Taylor Fritz and Frances Tiafoe from the U.S. in singles action.

Fritz is ranked No. 8 in the world, Tiafoe No. 15. Among the other top players scheduled to appear: Denis Shapovalov of Canada, Miomir Kecmanovic of Serbia, John Isner of the U.S., Adrian Mannarino of France, Ilya Ivashka of Belarus, and Taro Daniel of Japan. Reilly Opelka, winner of 2022’s inaugural Dallas Open, had to withdraw this year due to injury.

Although Tiafoe is considered one of the fastest players on the pro tour, CultureMap managed to catch up with him on his way to Dallas.

CultureMap: You caused a major fashion ruckus with the mega-decibel outfit you wore during the recent Australian Open. How did that happen? Was it your idea or Nike’s and will you be wearing it during the Dallas Open?

Frances Tiafoe: I’m not in a position where I can sit with Nike and tell them what I want to wear and they’ll make it happen. It definitely wasn’t coming from me. All they told me was, I was going to wear something sleeveless and it’s going to be loud. I said alright, cool.

When I got there and saw it, I said, well, it’s definitely loud. I thought, I’ll rock it. I think I can pull this off. They gave me an alternative outfit but I thought it was kind of bland. Let’s go with the loud one. In Round One, the outfit was going everywhere. Round Two, yeah, all the attention was really cool. I don’t know if I’ll be bringing it out for the next tournament. Maybe I’ll have some different cool ones coming. We’ll see.

CM: Speaking of unusual, your forehand doesn’t resemble anything in a tennis instruction manual. Same question, how did that happen?

FT: I used to have a normal forehand, technique-wise. Everything I do is unorthodox. I have a certain flavor with everything I do. I just tried something different and it felt good, it felt loose. Obviously I’ve had coaches try to change it when I was struggling. I was told that it wouldn’t work at this level or that level. Now I’m sitting close to the top of the game and it’s proved to work at every level. It is what it is. I just hope that kids don’t want to copy it because it’s not ideal.

CM: Unlike many players, you seem to have fun on the court. Is that something that comes naturally or did you have to work at letting yourself enjoy tennis?

FT: No, no, no, it’s not a pre-meditated thing. Who I am on the court is just who I am as a person. I’m a genuine dude. I like to have fun. I’m blessed to be out here playing tennis and playing at a high level in front of people who want to watch me play. I like when people scream my name. I have little kids mimicking some of my celebrations and stuff. It’s already an atmosphere before I even do anything. This is fun.

CM: You beat the great Rafael Nadal at the U.S. Open last year. It was one of the most exciting matches ever at the Open. My heart was pounding watching at home as you drew closer to match point. How did you keep your cool down the stretch? Was your heart pounding, too?

FT: Absolutely! My legs were like cement close to the end of the match. It was partly because I was tired, also because I was so nervous. Yeah, the first time you beat a GOAT, those wins are hard to come by. It’s not easy at all, it’s one of those things you don’t know what to expect because you’ve never been there before. I was trying to stay in the moment, stay locked in, not worrying too much about the score line. I thought I did a good job.

CM: You and Jack Sock defeated Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal at last year’s Laver Cup. It was Federer’s final match of his career. Did any part of you think, maybe this isn’t such a good idea? Maybe I should let Federer win?

FT: I knew what time it was when I got out there. I knew I was going to be behind the 8 ball. Not that everybody was going to be against me, but they would be for Roger. I wasn’t going to lie down. I’m a competitor. It was interesting. I hit him and the crowd booed me. I had never been in a situation like that. Hey, it’s kind of cool to say that I beat Roger Federer in his last match. I don’t think he was apologizing for beating everybody for 20-plus years. I think he’s sleeping perfectly fine at night.

CM: What was the first extravagant or crazy thing you bought when you started cashing big tournament paychecks?

FT: I like to buy nice clothes and stuff. I’m not really a crazy spender. I like knowing I can take care of my family, stuff like that. I got my brother a car, a C-class Mercedes, for his birthday. He’s my twin brother and we turned 25. Seeing other people happy from what I’m able to do for them means more to me.

CM: You seemed heartbroken and practically in tears after you lost to Carlos Alcaraz in the U.S. Open semifinals last year. How do you get over a defeat like that?

FT: Every loss hurts but the Slams hurt a little harder. The Alcaraz match was devastating. The love I felt from the fans was something. I was close to something really special, something I really wasn’t planning when I got to New York. Time helps you get over it. With tennis, there are so many events, there’s always the next thing. I wanted to attack the next thing, which happened to be the Laver Cup. If you go there and clinch the Laver Cup and beat Roger Federer, that helps you.

CM: You’re wearing a necklace that says “Big Foe.” When are you getting your own signature tennis shoe?

FT: I rock the “Big Foe,” man, the lifestyle. I love my nickname. The fans call me that and it’s pretty cool. It’s about being me and enjoying my life. About my own shoe, you’ll have to ask Nike about that. Maybe if I win a Slam that will change. I’m just happy to have some shoes on my feet so I can go out and play this sport.

. ---

The Dallas Open runs daily through February 12 at Styslinger / Altec Tennis Complex (at SMU), with sessions at 12 and 7 pm. Tickets and more information at dallasopen.com.

celebrities interview sports

Movie Review

Andrew Garfield leads peasant rebellion in medieval film The Uprising

Photo by Betina La Plante/Focus Features

Andrew Garfield in The Uprising.

Writer/director Paul Greengrass made his name with a cinéma vérité style of filmmaking that brought immediacy and depth to three Jason Bourne films, United 93, Captain Phillips, and more. In The Uprising, he uses those skills to tell the story of the so-called Peasants’ Revolt in 14th century England.

Greengrass wastes no time starting the main plot as Ploughman (Andrew Garfield) and his fellow villagers object to onerous taxes put on them by the country’s nobility, led by the young King Richard II (Woody Norman), to fund an ongoing war. Ploughman initiates a violent response over the tone-deaf — and unseemly — way the king’s guard go about their business, and the rebellion soon starts to spread across the countryside, with the citizens looking for a degree of autonomy.

The ever-expanding group makes their way toward London to try to make their case to the king himself. Meanwhile, the king’s top advisors, including Archbishop Sudbury (Stephen Dillane) and Treasurer Hales (Tom Hollander), try to usurp power from the inexperienced monarch even as the king’s mother (Katherine Waterston) tries to get him to be more assertive.

The history of the English monarchy is long and lurid, as Shakespeare detailed in multiple plays, including Richard II. Though the events in the film took place almost 650 years ago, it’s easy to see parallels between what the peasants were fighting for and modern-day politics. Greengrass’ storytelling intent is solid, and the righteous anger the citizens feel is initially relatable and palpable.

But the populism theme of the story soon gets bogged down in drudgery and minutiae that is difficult to understand, especially when the details are lost in the thick regional English accents. The leaders of the rebels — including John Ball (Jamie Bell), Wat Tyler (Cosmo Jarvis), and Alyce (Thomasin McKenzie) — are shown doing a lot of planning, but the strong feelings they have about their quest don’t come across well, leaving the audience as passive observers.

When there is action, Greengrass and his team employ a frenetic style that is not great for comprehension. While the gist of what is happening and what side is winning is legible, individual moments go by so quickly so as to be nearly meaningless. Save for Ploughman, any connection that has been made with various characters proves futile, as Greengrass doesn’t seem to have any time for emotion. Scenes that should feel thrilling or heartbreaking instead come off as empty.

Garfield is a two-time Oscar nominee who has done great work across multiple genres. He’s fine in this role, but whether it’s the story, the filmmaking, or something else, he’s not as captivating as usual. The same goes for other strong actors like Bell, McKenzie, Dillane, Hollander, and Waterston, who each seem to be giving their all to their performances but are somehow muted in the process.

Done right, The Uprising could have been a rip-roaring account of people standing up against their oppressors. What Greengrass has made, though, is a film that can’t translate its medieval story for a modern audience and concentrates too much on unexciting elements and too little on thrilling ones.

---

The Uprising is now playing in theaters.

movies film reviews