Election News

Dallas decriminalizes marijuana and other election results

Dallas voted to decriminalize marijuana.

Redheaded Blackbelt

Dallas voted to decriminalize marijuana among the results of the November 5, 2024, election. Other measures included 18 propositions, a presidential election, plus votes on Senate and U.S. House of Representatives.

Figures are from the Dallas County election results which were last updated on Wednesday, November 6, 2:34:56 AM as follows:

National elections
Dallas County voted solidly blue with results that differed greatly from the actual outcome of the elections, as follows:

President: In Dallas County, Kamala Harris won with 497,992 votes (59.72%) vs. Donald Trump, who earned 316,416 votes (37.94%).

Senate: In Dallas County, Colin Allred won with 517,894 votes (62.88%) vs. Ted Cruz, who earned 285,726 votes (34.69%).

U.S. House of Representatives

District 5: Ruth Torres (D) won with 69,046 votes (51.29%) vs. Lance Gooden (R) who earned 65,579 votes (48.71%).
District 6: John Love III (D) won with 19,846 votes (50.94%) vs. Jake Elizey (R), who earned 19,111 votes (49%).
District 24: Beth Van Duyne (R) won with 74,601 votes (56.51%) vs. Sam Eppler (D) who earned 57,409 votes (43.49%).
District 30: Jasmine Crockett (D) won with 180,465 votes (85,24%) vs. Jamar Jefferson (Lib) who earned 31,244 votes (14.76%)
District 32: Julie Johnson (D) won with 117,053 votes (61%) vs. Darrell Day, who earned 69,928 votes (36.45%).
District 33: Marc Veasey (D) won with 56,713 votes (67.23%) vs. Patrick David Gillespie (R) who earned 27,645 votes (32.77%).

Marijuana
Voters approved the decriminalization of marijuana in Proposition R. Also known as the “Dallas Freedom Act” and spearheaded by Ground Game Texas, it prohibits the Dallas Police Department from making arrests or issuing citations for marijuana possession or considering the odor of marijuana as probable cause for search or seizure, except as part of a violent felony or high priority narcotics felony investigation, for those with four ounces or less of marijuana. The proposition got a high-profile endorsement from Willie Nelson.

Propositions
There were 18 proposed amendments to the Dallas city charter that included 14 from the Dallas City Council and four from resident petitions. Nearly all passed.

Proposition A: City of Dallas would contribute to the city’s employees’ retirement fund:
For 240,470 (68.74%) Against 109,365 (31.26%) - Total: 349,835

Proposition B: Add a preamble to the charter that declares the city to be an equitable democracy, comprised of representatives that act to make the city fair, equitable, just and safe for all residents.
For 261,727 (72.63%) Against 98,646 (27.37%) - Total: 360,373

Proposition C: Increase annual salary for the mayor to $110,000 (up from $80,000) and the annual salary for city council members to $90,000 (up from $60,000)
Against 210,409 (57.78%) For 153,729 (42.22%) - Total: 364,138

Proposition D: Shift city elections from May to new date.
For 231,096 (65.13%) Against 123,736 (34.87%) - Total: 354,832

Proposition E: Eliminate ability for city council members to run again after serving the maximum four two-year terms and eliminate the ability for the mayor to run for mayor again after serving the maximum two four-year terms.
For 250,932 (68.99%) Against 112,746 (31.01%) - Total: 363,578

Proposition F: Require city council to provide employees to the city secretary and city auditor.
For 237,526 (67.62%) Against 113,724 (32.38%) - Total: 351,250

Proposition G: Add eligibility criteria for serving on the city’s redistricting commission.
For 247,680 (70.75%) Against 102,394 (29.25%) - Total: 350,074

Proposition H: Eliminate the requirement that members of the redistricting commission, city plan commission, civil service board, and park and recreation be registered to vote, qualified voters or qualified taxpaying citizens.
For 186,225 (52.22%) Against 170,402 (47.78%) - Total: 356,627

Proposition I: Extend deadline to collect signatures for initiative and referendum ordinances from 60 to 120 days and reduce the number of signatures required on a petition from 10% of the qualified Dallas voters to 5%.
For 191,766 (54.76%) Against 158,410 (45.24%) - Total: 350,176

Proposition J: Allow the city council’s appointments to city boards and commissions to be replaced by city council prior to the completion of a member’s two-year term.
For 212,388 (61.39%) Against 133,550 (38.61%) - Total: 345,938

Proposition L: Make the city’s Inspector General appointed by the city council and outline the duties of the Inspector General.
For 239,521 (69.56%) Against 104,807 (30.44%) - Total: 344,338

Proposition O: Require associate municipal judges be residents of the city of Dallas within four months of the date of appointment and practicing attorneys in good standing; associate municipal judges must be appointed by the city council and receive assignments from the administrative judge or administrative judge’s designee.
For 277,116 (79.64%) Against 70,842 (20.36%) - Total: 347,958

Proposition P: Delete requirement that a city employee who appeals their firing or demotion pay half of the costs associated with the appeal hearing.
For 189,241 (54.69%) Against 156,774 (45.31%) - Total: 346,015

Proposition Q: Align city charter with city code or state law and better match what the city’s practices are now.
For 251,107 (72.9%) Against 93,355 (27.1%) - Total: 344,462

Proposition R: Decriminalize possession of marijuana for those with four ounces or less.
For 242,241 (66.51%) Against 121,999 (33.49%) - Total: 364,240

Proposition S: One of three controversial propositions from Dallas HERO group allows any resident of Dallas to bring a lawsuit against the city to require the city to comply with provisions of the city charter, city ordinances, and state law. It also waives the city’s governmental immunity from suit and liability in claims brought under the amendment.
For 197,523 (55.04%) Against 161,329 (44.96%) - Total: 358,852

Proposition T: One of three controversial propositions from Dallas HERO group requires the city to conduct a city-commissioned community survey each year of a minimum of 1,400 Dallas residents that results in either the city manager earning a performance-based pay raise or the city manager’s firing.
Against 198,769 (55.27%) For 160,858 (44.73%) - Total: 359,627

Proposition U: One of three controversial propositions from Dallas HERO group has two elements: Dedicate at least 50% of new revenue each year to fund the Dallas Police and Fire Pension. Require Dallas to maintain a force of at least 4,000 police officers and increase starting pay for officers.
For 183,450 (50.52%) Against 179,658 (49.48%) - Total: 363,108

Hemp news

Texas cannabis businesses sue state to block ban on smokeable hemp

Photo by CRYSTALWEED cannabis on Unsplash

Texas is cracking down on smokeable hemp.

Texas hemp industry leaders and advocacy groups have sued the state to block new regulations that eliminate natural smokeable hemp products and increase licensing fees.

The Texas Hemp Business Council, Hemp Industry & Farmers of America, and several Texas-based dispensaries and manufacturers filed for a temporary restraining order in state district court in Travis County against the Texas Department of State Health Services and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission on Tuesday, April 6. They argue that the agencies have overstepped their constitutional authority by rewriting the statutory definitions of hemp established by lawmakers in 2019.

“Under current Texas law, hemp is defined by its delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent,” said David Sergi, an attorney for the hemp coalition, in a press release. “These Texas officials and state agencies are clearly attempting to create new law in direct contradiction to what the Texas legislature intended.”

The background
Even though Texas law bans marijuana, lawmakers legalized hemp in 2019. State law defines hemp as containing less than 0.3 percent levels of intoxicating Delta-9 THC.

To get around the law’s Delta-9 THC restrictions, manufacturers started cultivating hemp plants with another type of THC, called THCA, that, when ignited in a joint or smokeable product, can produce a high. Many lawmakers have said this legal loophole has allowed a recreational THC market to appear overnight without direct approval from the state.

Last year, the Texas Legislature voted to ban the products out of fear that these intoxicating products were consistently getting into the hands of children. But, Gov. Greg Abbott vetoed the decision last summer, before asking the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission and DSHS to increase regulations on the industry instead.

The Texas Department of State Health Services released regulations on consumable hemp-derived THC products that went into effect on March 31. These new regulations include child-resistant packaging, a significant increase in licensing fees, new labeling, testing, and bookkeeping requirements. The rules also codify the legal purchasing age to 21, which went into effect last year as an emergency directive.

Why the hemp industry sued
Also under the new rules, laboratories tests now measure the total amount of any THC in a product. If the THC levels exceed the 0.3 percent threshold, even if it’s only activated upon being smoked, the product will be noncompliant under state regulations. As a result, some of the most popular hemp products, like THCA flower and pre-rolled joints, have been banned.

Hemp businesses caught selling noncompliant products face a range of penalties and fines, including license revocation and up to $10,000 in violation fees for each day these products were sold in stores.

“An administrative agency may not substitute its own policy judgment for the outcome produced by the constitutional lawmaking process,” the lawsuit states. “The Texas Constitution vests legislative power in the Legislature, not administrative agencies.”

Retailers cannot sell hemp to out-of-state customers either.

The rules also increase licensing fees for manufacturers of hemp-derived THC from $258 to $10,000 per facility and retail registrations from $155 to $5,000, which industry leaders say will fulfill the ban by forcing businesses to close. The hemp business community’s lawsuit is not challenging the other new regulations, including the age verification or ones they say protect consumers.

“Texas hemp businesses wholeheartedly support those regulations, as they fall within the agency’s authority,” said Sergi. “We are seeking to halt rules that would effectively end the in-state production of hemp and the sale of hemp products — items the Legislature chose not to ban during recent legislative and special sessions.”

What the state says
Concerns about the safety of these high-THC products among youth led lawmakers to attempt to ban hemp-derived THC products outright last year. While the overall ban didn’t succeed, lawmakers successfully banned vape pens containing THC and other hemp-derived intoxicating chemicals.

Data provided from the Texas Poison Center Network confirms a sharp increase in cannabis-related poisoning calls starting in 2019, a year after hemp-derived THC was legalized by the federal government, from 923 to a 10-year high of 2,592 in 2024. Calls climbed to 2,669 last year. The majority of these calls involve suspected poisoning of children under the age of five and teenagers.

Drug policy experts said these numbers seem alarming, but it is natural for poisoning calls to increase when a drug has become legalized, and the data needs additional context before making conclusions from it.

Jennifer Ruffcorn, spokesperson for HHSC, directed questions about the lawsuit and what it means for the new hemp regulations to DSHS.

Lara Anton, spokesperson for DSHS, declined to comment on pending litigation.

What’s next
The hemp industry’s battle to stay alive in Texas started back in 2021 when the state health agency classified any amount of a natural intoxicating hemp compound called delta-8 THC as illegal. The hemp industry sued the state over its ban on delta-8 and the Texas Supreme Court is expected to consider the case this year.

The delta-8 lawsuit will have an impact on the outcome of the most recent lawsuit over the smokeable hemp ban because both lawsuits challenge the authority of a state health agency to make changes to the market without approval from lawmakers or the public.

---

This story was originally published by The Texas Tribune and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

marijuana lawsuit cannabis