Since Klyde Warren Park opened in October 2012, Dallas residents have had a plethora of outdoor activities to enjoy. Daily exercise classes, a darling dog park and a rocking special events pavilion keep the crowds entertained.
But arguably the most popular area has been the children's park, where kids can climb on rope webs, play in water, or look down on others from a tree house.
Now the park will have even more to offer kids with Imagination Playground in a Cart. Every Tuesday from 9 am to noon, through at least the end of summer, four carts filled with foam blocks, chutes, gears, sprockets, noodles, balls and other objects will be available for children to play with and put together in any way they see fit.
About a dozen kids from the Boys & Girls Club of Greater Dallas were on hand Tuesday morning to be the first to test out the equipment. The objects were organized in specific bins, but once the kids were let loose, order quickly gave way to joyous chaos, with creations ranging from barbells to towers to tunnels.
Thanks for the equipment goes to Let's Play grant from Dr Pepper Snapple Group and KaBOOM!, a group dedicated to offering more opportunities for play. Those two groups plan to either build or renovate 2,000 playgrounds by the end of the year.
The Imagination Playground equipment is not currently available in any other park in Dallas, and Klyde Warren Park could possibly add days if it proves popular. Based on the reaction at the unveiling, that shouldn't be a problem.
Although sharing was the norm, some hoarding of equipment did occur.
Photo by Jennifer Smart Klyde Warren Park
Although sharing was the norm, some hoarding of equipment did occur.
Writer/director Paul Greengrass made his name with a cinéma vérité style of filmmaking that brought immediacy and depth to three Jason Bourne films, United 93, Captain Phillips, and more. In The Uprising, he uses those skills to tell the story of the so-called Peasants’ Revolt in 14th century England.
Greengrass wastes no time starting the main plot as Ploughman (Andrew Garfield) and his fellow villagers object to onerous taxes put on them by the country’s nobility, led by the young King Richard II (Woody Norman), to fund an ongoing war. Ploughman initiates a violent response over the tone-deaf — and unseemly — way the king’s guard go about their business, and the rebellion soon starts to spread across the countryside, with the citizens looking for a degree of autonomy.
The ever-expanding group makes their way toward London to try to make their case to the king himself. Meanwhile, the king’s top advisors, including Archbishop Sudbury (Stephen Dillane) and Treasurer Hales (Tom Hollander), try to usurp power from the inexperienced monarch even as the king’s mother (Katherine Waterston) tries to get him to be more assertive.
The history of the English monarchy is long and lurid, as Shakespeare detailed in multiple plays, including Richard II. Though the events in the film took place almost 650 years ago, it’s easy to see parallels between what the peasants were fighting for and modern-day politics. Greengrass’ storytelling intent is solid, and the righteous anger the citizens feel is initially relatable and palpable.
But the populism theme of the story soon gets bogged down in drudgery and minutiae that is difficult to understand, especially when the details are lost in the thick regional English accents. The leaders of the rebels — including John Ball (Jamie Bell), Wat Tyler (Cosmo Jarvis), and Alyce (Thomasin McKenzie) — are shown doing a lot of planning, but the strong feelings they have about their quest don’t come across well, leaving the audience as passive observers.
When there is action, Greengrass and his team employ a frenetic style that is not great for comprehension. While the gist of what is happening and what side is winning is legible, individual moments go by so quickly so as to be nearly meaningless. Save for Ploughman, any connection that has been made with various characters proves futile, as Greengrass doesn’t seem to have any time for emotion. Scenes that should feel thrilling or heartbreaking instead come off as empty.
Garfield is a two-time Oscar nominee who has done great work across multiple genres. He’s fine in this role, but whether it’s the story, the filmmaking, or something else, he’s not as captivating as usual. The same goes for other strong actors like Bell, McKenzie, Dillane, Hollander, and Waterston, who each seem to be giving their all to their performances but are somehow muted in the process.
Done right, The Uprising could have been a rip-roaring account of people standing up against their oppressors. What Greengrass has made, though, is a film that can’t translate its medieval story for a modern audience and concentrates too much on unexciting elements and too little on thrilling ones.
